首页> 外文OA文献 >Current perception threshold and reaction time in the assessment of sensory peripheral nerve fibers through sinusoidal electrical stimulation at different frequencies
【2h】

Current perception threshold and reaction time in the assessment of sensory peripheral nerve fibers through sinusoidal electrical stimulation at different frequencies

机译:通过不同频率的正弦电刺激评估感觉周围神经纤维的电流感知阈值和反应时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The Perception Sensory Threshold (ST) for sinusoidal current stimuli at 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz is commonly used in the assessment of peripheral nerve fibers (C, Aδ, and Aβ, respectively). However, the neuroselectivity of these frequencies is far from consensus. In addition, Reaction Time (RT) measurements suggest that 2,000 Hz stimuli excite Aβ-fibers, 250 Hz Aβ- or Aδ-fibers, as well as 5 Hz Aβ-, Aδ- or C-fibers. Therefore, we suppose that the sinusoidal current neuroselectivity may be better observed if ST and RT parameters are jointly evaluated. In addition, we have investigated whether there are other sets of frequencies that could be used. METHODS: Thus this work investigates ST and RT for stimuli with frequency ranging from 1 to 3,000 Hz, on 28 healthy subjects aged from 19 to 44 years old (27.1±5.49). ST and RT dissimilarity among different frequencies was evaluated applying bi-dimensional Fisher Quadratic Discriminant. RESULTS: The lowest classification error (3.6%) was obtained for 1, 250, and 3,000 Hz. Error for 5, 250, and 2,000Hz was 16.7%. Stimulation frequency at 1 Hz evoked more sensations related to C-fibers (53% of reports) than to Aβ-fibers (36%). However, this behavior did not repeat itself at 5 Hz (only 21% of perceptions were related to C-fibers against 64% to Aβ-fibers). Sensations related to Aβ-fibers prevailed for the highest frequencies presented to the subjects (2,000 Hz - 82% and 3,000 Hz - 93%). Mean RT values showed a decreasing trend with frequency. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that frequencies 1, 250, and 3,000 Hz are more neuroselective than 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz for the evaluation of peripheral sensitive fibers. Furthermore, they show RT usefulness.
机译:简介:在5、250和2,000 Hz的正弦电流刺激的感知感觉阈值(ST)通常用于评估周围神经纤维(分别为C,Aδ和Aβ)。然而,这些频率的神经选择性远未达成共识。另外,反应时间(RT)测量表明2,000 Hz的刺激会激发Aβ纤维,250 Hz的Aβ或Aδ纤维以及5 Hz的Aβ,Aδ或C纤维。因此,我们假设,如果联合评估ST和RT参数,可能会更好地观察到正弦电流神经选择性。另外,我们研究了是否可以使用其他频率集。方法:因此,这项研究调查了年龄在19至44岁(27.1±5.49)的28位健康受试者的ST和RT在1至3,000 Hz频率范围内的刺激。应用二维Fisher二次判别法评估了不同频率之间的ST和RT差异。结果:在1、250和3,000 Hz处获得最低的分类误差(3.6%)。 5、250和2,000Hz的误差为16.7%。在1 Hz的刺激频率下,与C纤维(占报告的53%)相比,对Aβ纤维(占36%)的感觉更多。但是,这种行为并没有在5 Hz时重复出现(只有21%的感知与C纤维有关,而64%的感知与Aβ纤维有关)。与Aβ纤维相关的感觉占主导地位的最高频率出现在受试者身上(2,000 Hz-82%和3,000 Hz-93%)。 RT平均值显示出随频率降低的趋势。结论:这些结果表明,对于评估周围敏感纤维,频率1、250和3,000 Hz比5、250和2,000 Hz具有更高的神经选择性。此外,它们显示了RT的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号